Card-Sorting Exercise: Results: Part 1

[instructions] [link names] [results]
The inspiration for this test was taken from the methods described in:
Creating Web Site Designs Based on User Expectations and Feedback
Jeanette Fuccella and Jack Pizzolato, IBM Corporation

Purpose

To find out how our users group the information on our site into cateogories. This test is not so much to find out the exact names people use to describe things, but to find out if there are similarities in how our users mentally group the information in ways that are meaningful to them.

The Test

The test was conducted between June 16 and July 7, 1999.

9 volunteers took the deck of 106 cards, representing link names on our site and sorted them into categories of their own choosing. We took the card sets of each volunteer and laid them out on a table, with similar groupings of cards piled together. Certain trends became apparent at that point.

Summary of Trends

Here are some of the major categories that more than one person came up with: (in no particular order)

Thesis information
links to items having to do with thesis preparation from all over our site, style guides, our e-thesis collection, ordering MIT theses, etc.
Information by Course
links to subject info, e-reserves, etc., organized by MIT Course
New materials & library news
links to anything about new books, journals, databases, etc., and library news
Ordering materials
how to order materials, whether from doc services, interlibrary borrowing, theses, etc. (whether it cost money or not) - anything to do with ordering things was group together
Access policies for our library and other libraries
all the links having to do with various outside groups using our libraries, and our community using other libraries
About the MIT Libraries
people put all sorts of general info in a category like this, having to do with policies, services, hours, locations, etc.
Services
many people used this word to describe links about library services and library instruction
Materials/Content/Collections
these were some terms used to describe links about our collections and physical items (including equipment) in the libraries
Reference
links that had to do with asking reference questions, virtual reference, or reference desk hours were grouped here
Databases
people used this word to mean many different things, a much broader definition of it than we usually think of (no clear trend other than this)

Note: No one used the term, "resources," to describe anything.


Here are some things people said should be easy to get to from any page (perhaps in a navigation bar), or that should be on a top-level page:

Barton, Search, A-Z Index, Maps, Hours, FAQ, Site Map, Staff listings, Comments/Feedback

[web advisory group]