| |
the problem |
brainstormed ideas |
Nicole & Sands discussion notes |
| Home page |
|
|
|
| 1 |
lots of people just used general set; thought it would include all or have more than any other |
add descriptions of each set, with # of dbs in each. (various ways to do this without leaving the screen)
should we test making a larger General set that includes everything if possible? or as many as we can get to work? clearly mark it as taking longer and let people interrupt it.
should we have no General set at all and force them to choose?
should we rename the General set to something more descriptive? |
Nicole to mock up new home page with description of each category. Use css/hidden and show on mouseover...
Include number of dbs in eat set. |
| 2 |
front page doesn't say what it does |
add descriptive sentence or 2 |
Nicole & UIG to craft a sentence or 2 describing it. |
| 3 |
not many people used popup "what am I searching?" |
make descriptions hover or be right on the page |
get rid of this. Add a page that lists all the database and link to that somewhere. |
| 4 |
some people wanted to select more than one (which in menus you can sometimes do) |
consider radio buttons to show you must choose 1 at a time |
Nicole to mockup with radio buttons. |
| 5 |
people want one search for both ejs and databases
(the old Vera did this, so you didn't have to know which it is) |
advocate for ExLibris to put databases in SFX KB?
not easy to solve because SFX doesn't include databases |
???????????
Link from our new db listings to the ej listings and vice-versa. Include visual journal covers and featured dbs. |
| 6 |
someone wanted advanced search options (author/year/title) |
consider an advanced search screen or at least adding a couple of field search options in drop down (author & title) |
add author/title/keyword drop down to main search page. (Nicole mockup) |
| 7 |
some want to limit search to just articles |
we could have checkbox for including Barton results or not
some databases have articles AND books in them, no way to filter out
consider checkboxes next to all databases and then let them uncheck the ones they DON'T want to include |
too many dbs contain both... |
| 8 |
someone wants Boolean searching (1 person only?) |
|
no, doesn't work well in this environment |
| 9 |
sometimes hard to decide about Social Sciences vs. Humanities vs. General (so much possible overlap) |
|
partially addressed by moving up the "try your search in"
find more ways to cue people in to the fact that are multiple sets |
| 10 |
one user suggested having a cateogory for News databases |
consider some other possible groupings like this, not only subject-based groupings |
discuss at UIG more sets by type, like News or whatever |
| 11 |
Names of databases need to be descriptive, more descriptions about databases (Names like Historical Abstracts make sense, but many others do not). |
Use names of dbs, and also short description (1 sentence) of what things it contains. |
for each database, provide short description.... link to those from everywhere they are listed |
| Waiting Screen |
|
|
|
| 1 |
confused by changing order |
make the list alphabetical (already on our list) |
|
| 2 |
some users want to look at results that are available while others are still searching |
can we do this? |
not easy.... let's not for now, could be disorienting |
| 3 |
confused by the list of databases jumping over to the right when you land on results screen |
have the waiting screen show the list in the same place it is on results (to the right)
or on top if we end up moving it on results... point is to keep the list in one place on both screens |
Nicole to mockup new waiting screen with dbs and hits on the right (same as results). Use middle area for:
descriptions of the sets or dbs or whatever |
| Results screen |
|
|
|
| 1 |
getting back to the search screen... button says "Vera Multi-Search" |
change button to Home or New Search |
change button to say "Home" |
| 2 |
people confused by some having "delivery options" and some having titles clickable |
consider instead an indicator (colored text?) that says "full text available" by those that have it, and just link the titles to SFX for everything (bypassing menu when possible). Will still need a way to force menu to come up probably.
get rid of "delivery options" link.
|
(see above)
(consider a link to SFX menu for all results, too) |
| 3 |
hard to tell what the default sort is |
menu should say "sorted by relevance" instead of "sort by..." |
fix menu to say "sort by relevance" at the top by default |
| 4 |
Google Scholar results have lots of problems (missing metadata, nothing useful to link to since no "full record" in Google Scholar), sometimes shows preprint that we don't have instead of final version that we DO have. |
consider removing Google Scholar from multi-search and maybe just link to it (or not)
consider a check box to "include Google Scholar" and let users include it or not |
|
| 5 |
some don't notice Barton call numbers on our screen, but get it anyway because they all click to the Barton record |
leave it there, doesn't hurt to have it |
consider different color or something for call number line |
| 6 |
some things, such as patents don't show enough metadata for anyone to realize it's a patent and not an article |
eventually have a full record screen and show all possible metadata there |
full record display with all metadata on it |
| 7 |
people want to be able to sort after they have filtered to one database |
ask ExLibris for enhancement |
ask Exbris to fix this |
| 8 |
one user wondered why we are showing only 30 from each in the merged set when there are thousands? |
add a "get more results" button on last screen of results
have a way to jump to the last or first page of results in the page nav |
add a "get more results" button on last screen of results
have a way to jump to the last or first page of results in the page nav |
| 9 |
some users want to see the oldest stuff first |
add sort by date (oldest first) in addition to the current newest first |
Sands to look into whether we can sort by oldest first.
if not, advocate for that with EL. |
| 10 |
Expected database names on right to be the filters rather than links to native interfaces. |
Make those links be the filters and also add a descriptive link to the native interfaces. |
Nicole to mockup new version:
make those links be the filters and on top of page make it obvious what it's filtered by.
Also add different link to native interface. |
| 11 |
want the results more scannable (abstracts too long) |
already on our list to show only first xx chars of abstract with a "more" link that shows whole thing (on same page) |
already on our list to show only first xx chars of abstract with a "more" link that shows whole thing (on same page) |
| 12 |
some wanted search terms highlighted |
on our list for later anyway |
on our list for later anyway |
| 13 |
some wanted to refine search |
consider making the "filter by" options check boxes at top of page... like faceted browsing... |
|
| 14 |
thought "delivery options" means we have it, rather than that we don't have it |
rethink how we show whether we have the full text |
NIcole to mock up results screen with little indicator for full text .
We will no longer use "delivery options" but instead link all titles to SFX. (except for certain ones)
Bypass the menu when there is only 1 full text source. |
| old Vera |
|
|
|
| 1 |
sometimes link to description hard to see |
put database descriptions right on the screen rather than a separate page (keyword results in Vera has link only, other results screens in Vera show it right on the screen) |
in new pages, show descriptions on same screen that lists dbs |
| 2 |
"N/A" in coverage made someone skip over that whole column |
don't use "N/A" as a value, instead leave blank |
in future leave blank instead of "n/a" |
| SFX screens |
|
|
|
| 1 |
menu doesn't pop to front, sometimes hidden if it was already open |
consider SFX to not be a popup menu, but a regular screen with a regular link and ability to use back button |
|
| 2 |
full text link from SFX menu goes to tiny screen that you have to resize - that's annoying |
make that link open in full size window |
|
| 3 |
people not sure what Worldcat link is for |
describe it? "library catalogs worldwide"
|
|
| 4 |
little input boxes confusing: do you type into them? no, so why are they there? |
remove these |
|
| 5 |
some people don't see ILB/ILLIAD |
more description link... don't hyperlink the name Illiad (ok to have it there, but make descriptive name be the link) |
|
| 6 |
some don't know what "other holdings" options mean when there is no full text |
|
|
| 7 |
SFX menu confusing, not sure what ILLIAD is, wanted to fill in the blank boxes |
revise and rethink the whole menu |
(UIG to discuss entire revision of SFX menu... work with Rich on this). |
| 8 |
sometimes we end up on Full Text Finder gray screen listing several journals with same name... ugly screen, confusing |
we don't know for sure under what conditions this comes up... we think it's when the ISSN isn't being sent through and there is more than one journal with the same name... this is the screen where you have to select one.
customize this screen to make it clean and clear (like the others)
|
|
| All General Databases (all Engineering databases, etc) |
|
|
|
| 1 |
most people never clicked on these links (a few did) |
move it up on screen right under the list of each database
or
have a Databases A-Z link in prominent places
or rethink the way we get people to those lists |
move up after list of datbases, above "you searched in"
consider screen shots of home pages of the 40 dbs and promote them like Amazon does |
| E-journals A-Z |
|
|
|
| 1 |
no problems noted during test |
|
|
| 2 |
one professor emailed us because she couldn't figure out what to click on... didn't think the ej titles were clickable |
considering making title links underlined always |
|
| FAQ |
|
|
|
| 1 |
most never went there, one who did, didn't have patience to read long text |
make it more concise
add links at top from questions to answers |
make it more concise
add links at top from questions to answers |
| Other |
|
|
|
| 1 |
people made typos and didn't notice they had |
add spell-checker ("did you mean") |
Sands to research Aspell or other spellchecker.
|
| 2 |
Google Scholar - got too many results, not always the best, wanted it to rank lower |
considering removing Google Scholar or linking to it as an entirely separate thing. |
consider removing Google Scholar.... (discuss in UIG) |
| 3 |
Barton results had mixed results |
(what did we mean?) |
make 2 sets for all, one with Barton and one without, then offer a checkbox so users can decide whether to include Barton or not. |
| 4 |
e-journal titles and database titles - they searched in mulit-search box on results page |
add ej search also to nav bar on the top and maybe other places |
Nicole add ej title search in nav bar. |